Part III - NE Santa Cruz County Development Code
Chapter Three - Permit Requirements and Administrative Procedures
This chapter requires permits for land divisions and construction
activity, including the clearing and grading of sites in preparation for
construction. It also establishes permit application and review
procedures, and procedures for appeals, variances, the enforcement of this
ordinance, and amendments.
Permit Requirements
III.A. Permit Required. A permit shall be required for any division of
land; any clearing, grading, construction, or reconstruction; and any
change in land use, except as specifically exempted by III.D and E.
III.B. Class I Permits. The Class I permit application and review
procedure is found at III.I. A Class I permit shall be required for:
- the amendment of a subdivision plat;
- the construction or installation of a single family dwelling on an
existing or approved subdivision lot, on a parcel that is exempt from
subdivision review, as explained by III.D, or on a nonconforming lot,
as provided by I.E.3;
- the establishment of a home occupation;
- the construction or installation of an accessory building or
structure that is not specifically exempted by III.E;
- construction or installation of any sign that is not specifically
exempted by Appendix K;
- minor changes in existing commercial or industrial uses, including
changes in nonconforming uses, as provided by I.F.4;
- any other development that is not specifically exempted by III.D. or
III.E, but does not require a Class II permit, including the
replacement or enlargement of nonconforming buildings, as provided by
I.F.3; and
- clearing or grading preparatory to any development listed in
III.B.1-7.
III.C. Class II Permits. The Class II permit application and review
procedure can be found at III.J. A Class II permit shall required for:
- the platting of a subdivision;
- the construction or installation of high density residential,
commercial, and industrial developments;
- major changes of occupancy in existing commercial and industrial
developments; and
- clearing or grading preparatory to any development listed in
III.C.1-3.
III.D. Exemptions for Land Divisions. Land divisions that are not defined
as subdivisions by Arizona law shall be exempt. See "Subdivision" for that
definition. Exemption of a land division does not exempt development of
the lot or parcel created by that division from compliance with this ordinance.
III.E. Exemptions for Construction Activity. Activities listed here are
not exempt from any applicable requirement of this ordinance, except the
requirement for a permit. No permit shall be required for:
clearing and grading for agricultural, horticultural, or landscaping
purposes and the maintenance (but not change or expansion) of existing
uses or buildings;
maintenance, repair, or remodeling that does not alter the exterior
dimensions of a building or change its use (note that the county
building code may require a permit for repair or remodeling);
accessory buildings and uses that are also exempted by the county's
building code;
fences, but note that fences shall comply with the requirements of
this ordinance for clear sight triangles at intersections and points of
access to public roads;
minor utility installations; and
certain signs, as provided by Appendix K.
III.F. Application Forms. Applications for permits shall be submitted on
forms provided by the county. All information, including the site plan,
and all other maps, plans, drawings, tabulations, and calculations
required to demonstrate compliance with this ordinance, shall be required
for a complete application. The administrator may require submission of
multiple copies of the application forms and supporting materials. Site
plans and preliminary plats shall comply with the requirements of Appendix J.
III.G. Application Fees. Fees for each type of permit application and the
other procedures established by this ordinance, including appeals and
inspections, shall be established by resolution of the board.
III.H. Site Inspections. The filing of an application for a permit
constitutes permission for the administrator to inspect the proposed site
before acting on the application. Applicants for Class II permits shall be
required to arrange a site visit for the commission and the interested
public prior to the hearing on their application.
Permit Application and Review Procedures
III.I. Class I Permit Procedure. The Class I permit procedure provides for
prompt review of plat amendments and minor developments, while assuring
that they comply with this ordinance and are consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan for NE Santa Cruz County. The Class I permit procedure
shall be as follows:
- The developer shall file a properly completed permit application
form, the required supporting materials, and the required application
fee with the administrator. Any permit approved on the basis of an
incomplete application is void.
- The administrator shall determine whether the proposed development
complies with this ordinance. If the proposed development complies with
all applicable absolute performance standards and has a cumulative
score of zero or more on the relative performance standards, the
application for a permit shall be approved. If the proposed development
fails to comply with any applicable absolute performance standard or
has a cumulative score of zero or less on the relative performance
standards, the application for a permit shall be rejected. Where the
proposed development is part of a larger development for which a Class
II permit was previously approved, the administrator shall determine
whether it is in compliance with the previously approved development
plan and all conditions attached to that approval. Conditions may be
attached to the approval of any permit, as provided by III.K.
- The administrator shall notify the developer of the decision within
10 days, except as provided in III.I.4 and 5.
- Plat amendments approved by the administrator shall also be reviewed
and approved by the board. The administrator shall schedule such
reviews at the next regular board meeting at which the agenda will
allow proper consideration of the proposed plat amendment. If the board
affirms the administrator's findings it shall sign the amended plat.
The administrator shall notify the developer of the board's decision
within 10 days.
- The administrator may refer an application for a Class I permit to
the commission. Such referrals shall be based on the administrator's
written finding that the proposed development may have impacts that are
not ordinarily associated with developments for which a Class I permit
is required. The administrator shall schedule review of the referral
for the next regular commission meeting at which the agenda will allow
its proper consideration. The commission shall review the
administrator's findings and may, upon confirming those findings,
require that the application for a Class I permit be converted to an
application for a Class II permit.
- Any decision made by the administrator may be appealed to the BOA
using the appeals procedure of III.N. A notice of appeal shall be filed
with the administrator within 10 days after notice of the decision has
been issued. Developers proceed at their risk during the appeal period.
III.J. Class II Permit Procedure. The Class II permit procedure ensures
that developments that may have significant impacts comply with this
ordinance and are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for NE Santa Cruz
County. The Class II permit procedure shall be as follows:
- The developer shall file a request for preapplication review with
the administrator at least five days before the commission meeting at
which that review is requested.
- The administrator shall place the preapplication review on the
agenda of the next regular commission meeting at which the agenda
will permit its proper consideration.
- The commission shall conduct a preapplication review. This review
is not a regulatory proceeding. It is an opportunity for the
commission to be made aware of a possible development proposal and
for the developer to be made aware of possible questions about that
proposal and the applicable requirements of this ordinance.
- The preapplication review is also the time at which it is
determined whether a proposed development is a large-scale
development as defined by VI.EE or VII.AA. If the proposed
development is large-scale, a large-scale development study shall be
completed before an application is filed.
- The developer shall file a properly completed permit application
form; the required supporting materials, including a large-scale
development study, if one is required; and the required application fee
with the administrator at least 30 days before the regular commission
meeting at which a hearing on the application is requested. Any permit
approved on the basis of an incomplete application is void.
- The administrator shall place a hearing on the application on the
agenda of the regular commission meeting at which review was requested,
or the next regular commission meeting at which the agenda will permit
its proper review. Notice of this hearing shall be provided by:
- publication of at least one legal notice in the official
newspaper, with that notice appearing at least 15 days prior to the
hearing;
- posting on the site, in at least two places that are visible from
a public right-of-way, with at least one posted notice for each 1,320
feet of adjoining public right-of-way;
- first class mail to potentially affected public service providers,
including the Elgin Elementary School District and Sonoita-Elgin
Emergency Services, Inc., and to interested parties who have formally
requested such notice from the administrator; and
- first class mail to all owners of record of property (including
public land management agencies) within 1,000 feet of the exterior
boundaries of the proposed development, at least 15 days before the
hearing. Where more than 50 certified mail notices would be required,
the administrator may limit certified mail notice to the 50 nearest
owners of record.
- the contents of hearing notices shall be as required by III.L.
- the actual cost of providing notice shall be billed to the
developer, and is in addition to the application fee. No certificate
of compliance shall be issued if payment has not been received.
- Prior to the hearing, the administrator shall prepare a report on
the proposed development or contract for professional preparation of
such a report. Such reports shall include recommended performance
standard checklists and be made available to the commission, the
developer, and the public at least five days before the hearing.
- Prior to the hearing, the developer shall arrange a site visit for
the commission and the interested public. Notice of the site visit may
be included in the hearing notice, but that is not required. The
administrator shall give at least five days notice of the site visit to
the commission and interested parties who have requested such notice by
first class mail, email, or telephone. Consideration of an application
for a permit may be postponed if inclement weather or other conditions
prevent a site visit.
- The commission shall conduct a hearing on the proposed development
following the procedure established in III.P. At this hearing, the
commission shall determine whether the proposed development is in
compliance with this ordinance. If the proposed development complies
with all applicable absolute performance standards and has a cumulative
score on the relative performance standards sufficient to permit the
proposed density, the application for a permit shall be approved. If
the proposed development fails to comply with any applicable absolute
performance standard, has a cumulative score less than zero on the
relative performance standards, or has a cumulative score on the
relative performance standards insufficient to permit the proposed
density, the application for a permit shall be rejected. Conditions may
be attached to the approval of any permit, as provided by III.K.
- The administrator shall notify the developer and interested parties
who have formally requested such notice of the commission's decision
within 10 days.
- The commission's decision may be appealed to the BOA using the
appeals procedure of III.N. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the
administrator within 10 days after notice of the decision has been
issued. Developers proceed at their risk during the appeals period.
- The developer may file a final plat with the administrator at any
time after the Class II permit for a subdivision has been approved.
Phased final platting is permitted by VIII.D. Review of the final plat
shall proceed as follows:
- The administrator shall place review of the final plat on the
agenda of the next commission meeting at which the agenda permits its
proper consideration. No public notice or hearing is required for the
review of final plats.
- The commission shall review the final plat and determine whether
it is consistent with the Class II permit and this ordinance. If it
finds that the final plat is consistent, it shall approve that plat
and recommend that it be signed by the board. If it finds that the
final plat fails to comply, it shall reject that plat and recommend
that it not be signed by the board. Conditions may be attached to the
approval of a final plat, as provided in III.K.
- If the commission approves the final plat, the administrator shall
place it on the agenda of the next regular board meeting at which the
agenda will permit its proper consideration. Commission disapproval
of a final plat may be appealed to the board using the appeals
procedure of III.N. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the
administrator within 10 days after notice of the decision has been
issued.
- The board shall determine whether the final plat is consistent
with the subdivision permit and this ordinance. If it finds that the
final plat is consistent, it shall approve that plat. If it finds
that the final plat is not consistent, it shall reject that plat.
Conditions may be attached to board approval of a final plat, as
provided in III.K.
- The administrator shall notify the developer and interested
parties who have requested such notice of the board's decision within
10 days.
III.K. Conditions. Conditions designed to ensure compliance with specific
requirements of this ordinance may be imposed on the approval of any
permit or variance, if a list of all conditions imposed is sent to the
developer with the notice of the decision. That list shall specifically
identify the provision/s of this ordinance each condition is designed to
implement.
III.L. Hearing Notices. Hearing notices required by this ordinance shall
provide the following information: the name and mailing address of the
developer; the address of the proposed development or another general
description by which the public can locate it; the present use of the
site; the proposed use; the proposed number of residential lots or
dwellings and/or the proposed square footage of commercial or industrial
space; the date, time, and place of the hearing; and a statement of where
and when application materials are available for public review.
III.M. Approvals Valid for Two Years. Permits shall be valid for two years
from the date of approval, unless extended by a development agreement, as
provided in Chapter 8.
Appeals and Variances
III.N. Appeals. Decisions of the administrator and commission may be
appealed to the BOA using this procedure. This procedure shall also be
used for appeals of commission action on final plats to the board. A
notice of appeal must be filed within 10 days after the administrator's
notice of the decision being appealed.
- The appellant shall file a notice of appeal and the required appeal
fee with the administrator.
- The administrator shall place a hearing on the appeal on the agenda
of the next regular BOA or commission meeting at which the notice
requirements of III.N.3 can be met, and at which the agenda will allow
proper consideration of the appeal.
- The notice requirements for a hearing on an appeal from a decision
of the commission to the BOA shall be the same as for a hearing on a
Class II permit. See III.J.3. Notice of an appeal from a decision of
the administrator or from a commission decision to the board shall be
given by certified mail to the developer and the appellant, if the
appellant is not the developer; and by first class mail to interested
parties who have formally requested such notice from the administrator.
The actual cost of providing notice shall be billed to the appellant,
and is in addition to the appeal fee.
- The BOA or board shall conduct a hearing on the appeal following the
procedure established in III.P. At this hearing, the BOA or board shall
determine whether the decision being appealed is consistent with this
ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan for NE Santa Cruz County, and
affirm, modify, or overturn that decision accordingly.
- The administrator shall notify the appellant, noticed landowners,
and interested parties who have formally requested such notice of the
BOA or board action within 10 days.
- BOA decisions may be appealed to superior court, as authorized by
§11-807.D, ARS. Such appeals must be made within 30 days after notice
of the BOA decision is issued.
III.O. Variances. Variances provide relief for landowners who, due to some
unique physical characteristic of their property, would have no beneficial
use of that property if this ordinance is strictly enforced. The need for
a variance should be anticipated, and the variance obtained before filing
an application for a permit.
- The applicant shall file a complete application for a variance, all
required supporting materials, and the required variance fee with the
administrator.
- The administrator shall place a hearing on the proposed variance on
the agenda of the next regular BOA meeting for which the required
notice can be given and at which the agenda will allow its proper
consideration. Notice requirements for a hearing on a proposed variance
shall be the same as for a hearing on a Class II permit. See III.J.3.
- The BOA shall conduct a hearing on the proposed variance following
the procedure established in III.P.
- The BOA shall approve a variance only upon finding that:
- the need for a variance arises from physical limitations that are
peculiar to the lot or parcel on which the variance is requested;
- failure to approve the variance will result in an unnecessary
hardship because no reasonable conforming use of the lot or parcel is
possible without the variance;
- the need for a variance has not been created by action of the
owner; and
- approval of the variance will not be contrary to the general
intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan for NE Santa Cruz
County.
- conditions may be imposed on the approval of any variance, as
provided by III.K.
- The administrator shall notify the applicant, noticed landowners,
and interested parties who have formally requested such notice of the
BOA or board action within 10 days.
Hearing Procedure
III.P. Hearing Procedure. This procedure shall be followed in hearings
required by this ordinance.
- The presiding officer shall announce the purpose and subject of the
hearing.
- The presiding officer shall determine whether proper notice of the
hearing has been provided. If proper notice has not been provided, the
hearing shall be rescheduled.
- The presiding officer shall ask if any member of the hearing body
(commission, board, BOA) wishes to declare a conflict of interest in
the matter to be heard and excuse any member who declares such a
conflict from further participation in the hearing.
- The presiding officer shall ask the administrator to present a
report on the matter being considered. Following that report, the
presiding officer shall direct questions from the hearing body to the
administrator. Questions asked at this time shall be solely for the
purpose of clarifying the location and nature of the matter being heard.
- The presiding officer shall remind those present that all statements
given must address the merits of the matter being heard, as measured by
its compliance or lack of compliance with this ordinance and the
Comprehensive Plan for NE Santa Cruz County.
- The presiding officer shall ask for a statement from the developer,
appellant, or applicant. Members of the hearing body may ask questions
following this statement. Questions and replies shall be directed
through the presiding officer.
- Following the developer's or appellant's statement, the presiding
officer shall ask for statements from the public. Persons giving
statements shall begin by stating their name and mailing address.
Members of the hearing body may ask questions following any statement.
Questions and replies shall be directed through the presiding officer.
- When all statements have been given, the presiding officer shall ask
if any person who gave a statement wishes to speak in rebuttal to other
statements or to clarify their statement. Neither new statements nor
the introduction of new evidence shall be permitted at this time.
Questions from members of the hearing body may follow each rebuttal or
clarification. Questions and replies shall be directed through the
presiding officer.
- The presiding officer shall close the hearing and call for
discussion resulting in action, as provided by this ordinance.
- Written statements, plans, drawings, photographs, or other
materials offered in support of statements at a hearing are part of
that hearing's record and shall be retained by the county.
- These additional procedures may be used without prior notice to
assist in the conduct of large or controversial hearings:
- time limits may be imposed on statements given in order to ensure
completion of its agenda, and
- persons wishing to make a statement may be required to register
their intention to do so with the administrator before the hearing
begins. The presiding officer shall then use the register to call on
persons to present their statements.
III.Q. Hearings Recorded. The administrator shall keep a transcribable
record of all hearings on file for at least six months after the hearing.
III.R. Decision Record. All decisions required by this ordinance shall be
reported in written form, including, where relevant, completed performance
standards checklists.
III.S. Decision Deadline. Consideration of permit applications and other
matters for which a hearing is required by this ordinance may be tabled,
but for no more than 30 days.
Enforcement Procedures
III.T. Certificate of Compliance.
- A certificate of compliance shall be issued before any subdivision
lot is offered for sale, lease, or occupancy, or sold, leased, or
occupied OR before any development is occupied. A certificate of
compliance indicates that an on-site inspection has shown that the
development complies with this ordinance, including any conditions
imposed upon its approval or in a development agreement. Occupancy of a
development without a certificate of compliance shall be a violation of
this ordinance, subject to the criminal and civil penalties provided by
III.V.
- A temporary certificate of compliance may be issued to permit
temporary use of a building in cases where weather prevents the prompt
completion of such required improvements as landscaping. No temporary
certificate of compliance shall be issued for more than 180 days.
III.U. Enforcement Procedure. This ordinance may be violated by failing to
obtain a permit or failing to comply with conditions of permit approval.
Violations, which are subject to the criminal and civil penalties provided
by III.V., shall be remedied as follows.
- The administrator shall serve notice of the violation on the owner,
or notify the owner of the violation by posting on the site and mail.
The notice shall describe the violation, cite the section/s of this
ordinance being violated, and order the occupant to attain compliance
within 30 days or request a hearing.
- A person who is served with or receives a notice of violation may
request inspection by the administrator to show that compliance has
been attained within the 30 days allowed, or:
- file a written request with the administrator for an extension of
time to attain compliance, with such extensions being limited to a
maximum of 60 days and culminated by an inspection to show that
compliance has been attained; or
- file an appeal of the notice of violation, to be heard before the
BOA, following the appeals procedure of III.N.
- The administrator shall ask the county attorney to commence legal
action, as authorized by §11-808, ARS, against any person who fails to
attain compliance within the specified time, or to show, on appeal,
that a violation has not occurred.
- Where a permit is not subsequently issued, any site that has been
cleared or graded without a permit, shall be promptly revegetated or
otherwise stabilized to prevent accelerated runoff and soil erosion.
Failure to comply with this requirement shall be a violation of this
ordinance, subject to the criminal and civil penalties provided by
III.V.
III.V. Penalties. The county may seek injunctive relief against
violations. There may also be criminal and/or civil penalties for
violations of this ordinance.
- Violations are Class II misdemeanors, punishable by fines and
imprisonment. Each day in which a violation continues is a separate
offense.
- Alternatively, the county may assess civil penalties for violations,
in the same amount as the fines provided for a Class II misdemeanor.
Each day in which a violation continues is subject to a separate
penalty.
Amendment Procedure
III.W. Amendments. This ordinance may be amended using the following
procedure.
- Anyone desiring an amendment of this ordinance shall file a properly
completed application form, the required supporting materials, and the
required application fee with the administrator. The application fee is
waived for amendments initiated by the commission.
- The administrator shall place a hearing on the application on the
agenda of the next regular commission meeting for which the notice
requirements can be met and at which time will allow its proper
consideration. Notice requirements for a hearing on a proposed
amendment shall be the same as for hearings on Class II permits (see
III.J.3), except that:
- applications for text amendments do not require notice to
neighboring landowners, except as required by III.W.2.c;
- notices of proposed zoning map amendments must explain how
property owners within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the
proposed zoning map amendment may file approvals or protests of the
proposed amendment, including notice that if 20% of the property
owners within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the proposed
zoning map amendment file protests, the amendment must be approved by
three-fourths of the board, rather than by a simple majority; and
- Arizona law requires that all property owners be notified of
certain zoning amendments. See §11-829.2 and 3, ARS.
- Prior to the hearing, the administrator shall prepare, or contract
for professional preparation of, a report on the proposed amendment.
Such reports shall address the consistency of the proposed amendment
with the Comprehensive Plan for NE Santa Cruz County, and shall be made
available to the commission, the applicant, and the public at least
five days before the hearing.
- Prior to a hearing on a zoning map amendment, the applicant shall
arrange a site visit for the commission and the interested public.
Notice of the site visit may be included in the hearing notice, but
that is not required. The administrator shall give at least five days
notice of the site visit to the commission and interested parties who
have requested such notice by first class mail, email, or telephone.
Consideration of an amendment may be postponed if inclement weather or
other conditions prevent a site visit.
- The commission shall conduct a hearing on the proposed amendment
following the procedure established in III.P. At this hearing, the
commission shall determine whether the proposed amendment is consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan for NE Santa Cruz County, and recommend
that the board approve or reject it accordingly.
- The administrator shall convey the commission's recommendation to
the board and, unless the application is withdrawn, place a hearing on
the proposed amendment on the agenda of the next regular board meeting
for which the notice requirements can be met and at which time will
allow proper consideration of the proposed amendment. Notice of the
board's hearing shall be the same as for the commission's hearing. See
III.W.2.
- The board shall conduct a hearing on the proposed amendment
following the procedure established in III.P. At this hearing, the
board shall determine whether the proposed amendment is consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan for NE Santa Cruz County and approve or reject
it accordingly.
- The administrator shall notify the applicant and interested parties
who have formally requested such notice of the board's decision within
10 days.
Sonoita Crossroads Community Forum
P.O. Box 1274
Sonoita, AZ 85637
© 2002 Sonoita Crossroads Community Forum